Is this parameter necessary? Couldn't we just use the air flow parameters for the system the louver is on? For example, AirFlowExhaustDesign?
We have AirFlowAirTerminal, and AirFlowDamper, so this one follows that logic. But maybe we can eliminate these as well since AirFlowSupplyDesign, or AirFlowExhaustDesign could be used for air terminals or dampers. This would make them more universal.
The purpose of AirFlowAirTerminal and similar parameters for when you couldn't concatenate in the schedules. Lets take them out and see what happens. Worse comes to worse we can always add them back.
Join OpenRFA to help build the new master shared parameters for Revit.
Join us and collaborate